# Genomics Blog

Prior to the previous Alberta provincial election, the way math is taught in the province was one of the political issues. One party advocated that kids ‘learn basics first’ while at the same time promoting parental ‘choice’. The late Joe Bower, in his blog Return of the Math Wars, tried to make sense of this incredibly complex discussion. He noted that “*Maybe math and children haven't changed, but our understanding for how children learn math is more sophisticated than generations ago.*” He goes on to say “*As for right answers, there is only one right answer if we limit ourselves to asking questions that have only one right answer, such as 4 + 3*.” Meanwhile, a newspaper editorial informs us that Alberta Education has "dumbed down" math curriculum: “*The discovery approach has no place in arithmetic at the junior elementary level. There is nothing to discover*.”

The discussion continues. In the past couple of weeks, I’ve seen headlines like: Math experts say Alberta curriculum needs to be rethought; and another told us that Calgary parents discuss changing how math is taught. I might have been worried, but soon realized that there has been major controversy over the teaching of Math since before the beginning of the 16th century. In the book ‘*Infinitesimal: how a dangerous mathematical theory shaped the modern world*’ by Amir Alexander, I learned that nations actually went to war over the math curriculum.

Infinitesimal is divided into two parts. The first part examines the Protestant Reformation, the rise of the Jesuits as a teaching order, and the development of mathematics in Italy. This period culminated with the repression of the ideas of Galileo and his fellow Linceans with regard to the use of mathematical ideas that did not fit Euclidean geometry. The last part of the book follows the development of math to England and details the vicious debate between Thomas Hobbes and John Wallis. Hobbes looked at math as an intellectual pursuit and adhered to a strict interpretation of Euclidean geometry, while John Wallis thought of math as a useful tool. According to Alexander, first the Jesuits and then Thomas Hobbes saw Euclidean geometry as a metaphor for the societal order during tumultuous times. Galileo and Wallis and their followers developed mathematical methods that made assumptions about infinity and the infinitely small (thus: infinitesimal) that could not be demonstrated through geometry. They were on the leading edge of what was becoming the modern methods of algebra and calculus.

Alexander argues that:

“*At the opposite ends of the Continent, the struggle yielded opposite outcomes: in Italy the Jesuits prevailed over the Galileans, whereas in England, Wallis prevailed over Hobbes.”
“If any land was likely to pioneer a challenging new mathematics, it was Italy, whose art and science had inspired Europe since the Renaissance. England, meanwhile, would likely have remained what it had always been, an intellectual backwater feeding off the scraps of its more cultured continental neighbors.*”

“

*But things turned out differently*.” Alexander now sums up all the developments in math and science inspired by the mathematical leadership of Wallis, which gave England the upper hand in becoming such an industrial leader in the 19th century.

I really enjoyed reading this book. I pored over the history intertwined with the mathematics and the science that Alexander presents. It gave me a much greater appreciation for the math I know, and a desire to go back and review some of the math that I probably forgot immediately after I learned the algorithms in school. Yes, math can be taught as a series of algorithms, but it is understood better when learned through context. This book could appeal to adults and high school students who desire better appreciation of the history of how our math was developed.

By the way, while I was reading this book news came out that perhaps the Babylonians had invented astronomical geometry 1,400 years before Europeans. While this may be an interesting finding, their way of calculating planetary movement had no influence on the development of how we do math now, or on the more recent history of the world as presented by Amir Alexander.

And one more thing. All those little math puzzles that pop up on our social media streams that are to show how smart you are, how dumb you are, or how ridiculous the new math curriculum is; well, it turns out that for many of them, “

*You can interpret it in many ways; one way is no more correct than another. There are an infinite amount of possible answers*.”

Click here for a complete list of the books I have reviewed.

You can also find me on

## Categories

## Blog Roll

## Archive

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

February 2016

January 2016

December 2015

November 2015

October 2015

September 2015

August 2015

July 2015

June 2015

May 2015

April 2015

March 2015

February 2015

January 2015

December 2014

November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

May 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

September 2007

August 2007

## Comments